Month: March 2014
Interview with historian Yang Kuisong (杨奎松) on his view of modern Chinese history, esp. revolutionary history
《谈史求实:中国现代史读史札记》,杨奎松著,浙江大学出版社 2011年11月,38元
“Turbulent Past, Uncertain Future”: Interview with Jonathan Spence on his understanding of Chinese history
Turbulent Past, Uncertain Future
(Beijing) –British-born public intellectual, Jonathan Spence, has just released the 3rd edition of his most acclaimed work, “The Search for Modern China,” in the United States. This book, a survey of Chinese history spanning from the dawn of the Qing dynasty to the present day, emerged from his introductory courses given at Yale University, where Spence served as Sterling Professor of History for 15 years.
Taking aim at the prevalent idea of Chinese history which begins with the collapse of the dynastic political structure, Spence provides a view in which the country’s periods of weakness can be understood as part of a larger process in its development. China has absorbed many ideas from abroad and in some instances this emerged from both imperial weakness and imperial pressure, said Spence.
In a recent interview with Caixin, Spence talked about his understanding of Chinese history and the modern China. Excerpts of the interview follow.
Writer Yu Hua (余华) on the history of class struggle
中国荒诞的阶级斗争史
余华
阐述共产党在中国的执政经历,可以有很多角度,阶级斗争史是其中一个。
Comparative analysis by historian Zhao Qingyun (趙慶雲) of the concepts of “class” and “nation” in Chinese and North Korean historiography
“階級” 與 “民族” 的糾 — 中國、朝鮮的近代史書寫
趙慶雲
《二十一世纪》2013年12月140号, p. 99-107.
See http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ics/21c/issue/articles/140_1303058.pdf.
Thoughtful article by historian Lei Yi (雷颐) on the National Studies Fever
“国学热”、民族主义转向与思想史研究
For an online version in simplified characters see http://www.21ccom.net/plus/wapview.php?aid=103322#rd.
Xin Yi (辛逸) und Gao Jie (高洁) on the theory and practice of oral history
辛逸、高洁:口述史学新解 ——以山西十个合作社的口述史研究为例*
Philosopher Shan Jigang (单继刚) on a debate concerning historical materialism involving Chen Duxiu, Hu Shi, Zhang Junmai and Liang Qichao
唯物史观的“唯”:陈独秀与胡适、张君劢、梁启超之争
单继刚
内容提要:本文回顾了20世纪20年代发生在陈独秀和胡适、张君劢、梁启超之间的一场关于唯物史观的论辩,认为论辩的焦点是“唯”字的合理性问题。陈独秀把“唯”释为表示充要条件的“只有”,实际上是把精神的、人力的、意志的原因排斥在唯物史观之外,因而并不能使胡适、张君劢和梁启超信服。本文梳理了论辩各方的观点,并依据马克思的文本进行了评论。
关键词:唯物史观 陈独秀 胡适 张君劢 梁启超
原载《中国哲学史》2010年第3期。
录入编辑:乾乾
See http://www.philosophy.org.cn/Subject_info.aspx?n=20120504091123640858.
Very detailed and thoughtful article by Chen Yun (陈赟) on the reception of the progressive view of history, the modern Chinese crisis and the nature of modernity
进步的历史观与中国现代危机的特性
陈赟
发表日期:2005-4-18
See http://www.confucius2000.com/admin/list.asp?id=1729.
革命与创造的价值,是现代世界观完成自身的要求,只有以现代主体的劳动、革命、创造等价值为前提,世界才显现为意义的容器,显现为一个等待着主体去加工的、本身却没有深度的平面的物质材料的聚合体。但这同时也意味着,自然物理世界不是现代主体及其社会历史存在的前提,恰恰相反,后者构成了前者的存在根据。也就是说,人类社会及其历史构成了现代性意识中比“世界”更为深层的东西,世界观转向社会历史观,是现代性意识演进的必然。在这个转向过程,进步话语日益显示了它与现代性之间的深刻关联。
Historian Shu Xilong (舒习龙) on the spread of the evolutionary view of history and the innovation of historiography
内容摘要:19世纪末20世纪初,严复译介的《天演论》出版。此书从民族危机的严重现实出发,将英国思想家赫胥黎的生物进化论及其社会进化论与斯宾塞的社会达尔文主义思想糅合,在 中国 较为系统和深入地介绍了西方近代进化史观。严复宣传的社会进化论观点,适应了19世纪末中国形势的需要,它使立志改革和革命的人士有了新的思想武器,受到当时知识界的欢迎。蔡元培先生说;“五十年来,介绍西洋 哲学 的,要推侯官严复为第一”,“自此书出后,‘物竞’、‘争存’、‘优胜劣败’,成为人人的口头禅。”[i][p126]胡适也说过:“《天演论》出版不上几年,便风行全国,竟做了中学生的读物了。”[ii][p56] 西方进化论的传播,为戊戌时期的知识分子营造了崭新的理论氛围,它同救亡图存的历史需要想结合,为新史学的诞生提供了历史条件和理论准备。伴随历史观的变革,史家在进化史观的指导下对史书编撰进行了一系列的改造。本文拟对此做一初步的探讨和剖析。
See http://www.jiaoyuda.com/LiShiXue/2011-05/63726.htm, http://www.jiaoyuda.com/LiShiXue/2011-05/63726p2.htm.
Lay Buddhist Miaoyin’s (妙音) critique of the theory of evolution
三大证据相继破灭:进化论,一个错误的信仰
发布时间:2007年12月26日
来源:网易社区 2005-05-31
作者:妙音居士
See http://www.fjdh.cn/article/2007/12/135756538.html.
Article by Korean philosopher Jung Byung-seok (郑炳硕) analyzing Xiong Shili’s (熊十力) interpretation of the Book of Changes incl. his critique of evolutionism
熊十力之《周易》新诠释与儒学复兴
郑炳硕
(岭南大学 人文学部 哲学系,韩国 庆北 庆山)
摘要:熊十力生当20世纪前半叶,在面对中国固有的传统文化和西方的现代文化交锋的时代背景之下,把现实的根本问题判断为挺立民族文化主体的生命问题,企图通过对《周易》的改铸与辨伪的新的诠释来复兴儒家固有的生命力和创造精神,进而会通中西文化及哲学。
关键词:熊十力;周易;新儒学;创新
原载《周易研究》2002年第6期
作者简介:郑炳硕(1957-),男,韩国人,哲学博士,韩国岭南大学人文学部哲学系教授。
See http://zhouyi.sdu.edu.cn/yixuezhexue/zhengbingshuo.htm.
A new interpretation of Zhouyi by XIONG Shi-li and the revival of Confucianism
Jung Byung-seok
(Department of Philosophy, School of Humanisity, YeungNam University, Gyungsan, South Korea)
Abstract: Born in the earlier half period of the 20th century, when traditional Chinese culture was in conflict with the western one, XIONG Shi-li regarded strengthening the life of national culture as then the actual fundamental issue, in an attempt to revive intrinsic vitality and creative spirit of Confucianism by a new interpretation of Zhouyi, and further to merge eastern and western cultures as well as philosophies into one.
Key words: XIONG Shi-li; Zhouyi;neo-Confucianism; renewal
Artile by Gu Wenhao (顾文豪) on Hobsbawm’s last book “Fractured Times”
文化末世论:这是一个失去方向感的时代?
2014-03-21 10:28
来源:时代周报
See http://culture.hljnews.cn/system/2014/03/21/010079056.shtml.
《断裂的年代》【英】霍布斯鲍姆著中信出版社2014年1月出版
艾瑞克·霍布斯鲍姆是享誉国际、备受推崇的近代史大师。
作者:顾文豪
Just published: Transforming Consciousness: Yogācāra Thought in Modern China
Just published including several articles on the influence of Yogācāra Buddhism on some key thinkers such as Zhang Taiyan, Tan Sitong and Liang Shuming, who all had a considerable impact on the modern Chinese understanding of history and time.
Transforming Consciousness: Yogācāra Thought in Modern China (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), edited by John Makeham, xiii+436 pages
Abstract: The Western roots of many aspects of modern Chinese thought have been well documented. Far less well understood, and still largely overlooked, is the influence and significance of the main exemplar of Indian thought in modern China: Yogācāra Buddhist philosophy. This situation is all the more anomalous given that the revival of Yogācāra thought amongst leading Chinese intellectuals in the first three decades of the twentieth century played a decisive role in shaping how they engaged with major currents in modern Chinese thought: empirical science; “mind science” or psychology; evolutionary theory; Hegelian and Kantian philosophy; logic; and the place of Confucian thought in a modernizing China.
The influence and legacy of Indian thought have been ignored in conventional accounts of China’s modern intellectual
history. This volume sets out to achieve three goals. The first is to explain why this Indian philosophical system proved to be so attractive to influential Chinese intellectuals at the very moment in Chinese history when traditional knowledge systems and schemes of knowledge compartmentalization were being confronted by radically new knowledge systems introduced from the West. The next goal is to demonstrate how the revival of Yogācāra thought informed Chinese
responses to the challenges of modernity, in particular modern science and logic. The third goal is to highlight how Yogācāra thought shaped a major current in modern Chinese philosophy: New Confucianism.
Transforming Consciousness forces us to rethink the entire project in modern China of the “translation of the West.” Taken together, the chapters develop a wide-ranging and deeply sourced argument that Yogācāra Buddhism played a much more important role in the development of modern Chinese thought (including philosophy, religion, scientific
thinking, social, thought, and more) than has previously been recognized. They show that Yogācāra Buddhism enabled key intellectuals of the late Qing and early Republic to understand, accept, modify, and critique central elements of Western social, political, and scientific thought.
The chapters cover the entire period of Yogācāra’s distinct shaping of modern Chinese intellectual movements, from its roots in Meiji Japan through its impact on New Confucianism. If non-Buddhists found Yogācāra useful as an indigenous form of logic and scientific thinking, Buddhists found it useful in thinking through the fundamental principles of the Mahāyāna school, textual criticism, and reforming the canon. This is a crucial intervention into contemporary
scholarly understandings of China’s twentieth century, and it comes at a moment in which increasing attention is being paid to modern Chinese thought, both in Western scholarship and within China.
TOC
Historian Jiang Peng (姜芃) discussing recent developments in the theory of history in the West including English language publications on Chinese historiography
跨文化研究的话语——关于历史思维的讨论
姜芃
Influential historian of ideas Ge Zhaoguang (葛兆光) discussing the history of the writing of the history of philosophy in modern China
道统、系谱与历史——关于中国思想史脉络的来源与确立
葛兆光
网站编辑:薛强
来源:《文史哲》
日期:2013-03-19